Gilgamesh

Most people my age have at least heard of Gilgamesh.  The youth of today, robbed of true education, have no idea who he was.  A lot of you might need a refresher.  We've been told that Gilgamesh, sometimes known as Nimrod, was a mythical king in ancient Mesopotamia.  I believe there are even cartoons made of Gilgamesh and perhaps this was your introduction to him.  For those a little more learned, the Epic of Gilgamesh is panned as an ancient poem about a Sumerian King of the City of Uruk, which is in modern day Iraq.  He happens to be a giant who descended from the gods and is almost always depicted in sculptures as holding a lion in one hand and a snake in the other.  He goes on a journey with a friend to try to find immortality.  The story is fraught with danger, combat, gods and demi-gods.  His friend, Enkidu, is killed as punishment by the gods and the person he seeks to discover the story of the flood and immortality from is called, Utnapishtim, but is really Noah.  Gilgamesh is a hybrid human, with a mother that is a god and a father who was human.  Because he was not a true god, he could not be immortal and he dies in the end.  The Epic of Gilgamesh is considered the first book in humanity as it was written around 1800 BCE.  Written is wrong, it was etched in cuneiform onto a clay tablet, which remains today in the Ashmolean Museum in Oxford.  The tablets were derived from 5 poems written about Gilgamesh several hundred years prior and combined into the epic we now know.  You should read the book because the story is much more involved than the less-than Cliff Note version I just gave you.  I've been thinking about rereading it because I'm positive the version I read as a kid was not the book version written by historians.  Nevertheless, Gilgamesh is intriguing for many reasons.  

If you've never heard of the Sumerian King list, you are in for a treat.  The list was etched onto clay tablets some time around 2100 BCE, before the Epic of Gilgamesh.  The list will seem fantastical to you, but it is there for everyone to see.  The tablets were found in the early 1900's.  Many versions of this list have been found in various places, including Babylon, Assyria, Susa and the library in Nineveh.  This shows it was widely distributed.  I'm going to give you the partial list and it will include the names of the rulers as well as their length of reign.  This is taken directly from the tablets, with years replacing the Sumerian numerical units known as sars.

“…After the kingship descended from heaven, the kingship was in Eridug.

In Eridug, Alulim became king; he ruled for 28,800 years. 

Alaljar ruled for 36,000 years,

2 kings; they ruled for 64,800 years. Then Eridug fell and the kingship was taken to Bad-tibira.

In Bad-tibira, En-men-lu-ana ruled for 43,200 years. 

En-men-gal-ana ruled for 28,800 years. 

Dumuzid, the shepherd, ruled for 36,000 years.  Then Bad-tibira fell and the kingship was taken to Larag 

En-sipad-zid-ana ruled for 28,800 years.  Then Larag fell and the kingship was taken to Zimbir

En-men-dur-ana ruled for 21,000 years.  Then Zimbir fell and the kingship was taken to Shuruppag

Ubara-Tutu ruled for 18,600 years.

Then the flood swept over.  After the flood swept over the kingship was taken to Kish

23 kings ruled in Kish with 1,500 years being the longest and 325 years the least.  Ruling time diminishes now.  Kish is then defeated and the kingship was taken to E-anna.  E-anna is Uruk.  Again, ruling times now diminish drastically, as the first five rulers rule for 324, 420, 1,200, 100 and 126 years.  Gilgamesh is the last ruler to reign for an unusually long period of 126 years.  The next eleven rulers rule for normal human times through the 27th century BCE.  Again, a time of unusually long reigns comes back where rulers rule for hundreds of years.  The list goes all the way to about 1920 BCE with the last rulers all ruling for normal timeframes.

If you want to see a two-step, read the Wikipedia explanation of why scribes eons ago would write such exaggerations in the length of a kings rule.  It is laughable how big-archaeology tries to explain away the unexplainable.  They call the time before the flood to be mythical and don't even really believe a flood happened.  We now know there was a cataclysmic flood with 100% certainty, but the lengths they go to talk you out of believing any of what is written is so over-the-top CIA mind junk that it is laughable.  I'm unsure if it is just trying to have answers to everything even when they have no idea or just disinformation.  The problem is, these extraordinarily long reigns, line up with what you can read in many other ancient texts about the Annunaki.  It lines up with the Emerald Tablets of Thoth, who explains taking himself to the Halls of Amenti, underneath the pyramids, to put his body in stasis for 100,000 years, 10,000 at a time, to rest and move his consciousness to a new body.  Thoth happens to be the son of Enki.  Enki and Enlil are brothers and Enlil appears in the Epic of Gilgamesh and in many other ancient texts.  I'll hold on that for a minute.  The Seven Tablets of Creation, the Enuma Elish, the Veda texts, the Mahabharata, the Emerald Tablets and even the Dead Sea Scrolls all back this up.  Isn't it amazing that the Bible and all the amazing things that are written in it,  is believed by tens of millions, but ancient texts written long before, cross-referencing many of the same people and places, is considered myth?  I'm sure scientists don't believe the bible, in general, because one cannot verify some of the miracles in it, and faith cannot be recreated in a lab, but everyday more and more places written about in all of these texts are discovered.  Read up on the recent discovery of the City of Sodom and see how they found it, right where it was said to be in the bible and then read how they try to establish how it was destroyed through natural disaster rather than how it is believed God destroyed it.   Where does the truth lie?  Consensus is that Gilgamesh was a real king of Uruk, yet believing the other rulers existed on the list is that they were mythical. I doubt it.

In 2003, a German archaeologist, named, Jorg Fassbinder, of the Bavarian department of Historical Monuments in Munich, was conducting a dig in Uruk, Iraq.  The BBC wrote an article about it, link here, http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/2982891.stm  Fassbinder claims that he found the tomb of Gilgamesh.  He said that he used the description in the book to find the site.  From the article;

In the book - actually a set of inscribed clay tablets - Gilgamesh was described as having been buried under the Euphrates, in a tomb apparently constructed when the waters of the ancient river parted following his death.

"We found just outside the city an area in the middle of the former Euphrates river, the remains of such a building which could be interpreted as a burial," Mr Fassbinder said.

He said the amazing discovery of the ancient city under the Iraqi desert had been made possible by modern technology.

"By differences in magnetisation in the soil, you can look into the ground," Mr Fassbinder added.

"The difference between mudbricks and sediments in the Euphrates river gives a very detailed structure."

This creates a magnetogram, which is then digitally mapped, effectively giving a town plan of Uruk.

"The most surprising thing was that we found structures already described by Gilgamesh," Mr Fassbinder stated.

"We covered more than 100 hectares. We have found garden structures and field structures as described in the epic, and we found Babylonian houses."

But he said the most astonishing find was an incredibly sophisticated system of canals.

"Very clearly, we can see in the canals some structures showing that flooding destroyed some houses, which means it was a highly developed system.

"[It was] like Venice in the desert.

Just weeks after this discovery was reported by the BBC, the US and the coalition of the willing, invaded Iraq.  More interestingly, the US quickly set up a base over the sight and began digging, bringing in archaeology teams.  The museum in Baghdad was raided of 17,000 artifacts and many things were taken out of Iraq at this time.  Just recently, the founder of Hobby Lobby had to return a clay tablet about Gilgamesh he bought after it was determined to have been stolen from the Iraqi museum 22 years earlier.  I had heard for years that Saddam had a fascination with the Annunaki and actually had a stargate in his possession.  He either didn't know it was real or didn't know how to activate it and the US wasn't about to let him try.   We promptly took it upon invading, but I had never heard of the tomb of Gilgamesh being found.  There are a lot of stories about this incident online, but they all are the same with no new information.  A video of the discovery of Gilgamesh is out there and it is kind of eerie, but no way to verify it is true.  The video shows a very well preserved body, adorned with gold in a sarcophagus with no lid.  Gold trinkets are on either side of the body, photo above.  However, one thing you cannot ignore is what happened to Jorg Fassbinder.  Well, he was found and interviewed in 2014 and asked about going back in and digging where he found the tomb and said he no longer had interest in it.  Really?  The find of a lifetime and you're not interested?  Jorg knows a lot more than he's saying and has obviously been told to be quiet.  No archaeologist would ever say that, unless what he discovered was no longer there.  If Gilgamesh was found and his DNA tested and he was 100% human, well, it would be known worldwide.  If he wasn't 100% human, it would be covered up and it has been.  Not one word on Gilgamesh since that 2003 article.  There was a lot of interest in it before the war in the global press, but in 2016 work began again in Uruk and no one has said one word about Gilgamesh.  Isn't that interesting?  There are more than a handful of stories from soldiers that went into Babylon and Uruk that we know the military and CIA had a major interest in ancient archaeology in Iraq.  Why?   

I refuse to believe that ancient scribes used their time to write complete falacies.  They wouldn't try to make up fake time lines or etch bullshit just to make their boss happy.  Cuneiform was a profession and took years to learn.  I doubt they would sit around drinking wine and say, yeah I wrote this story about Gilgamesh, it's total bullshit, but it'll mess with people thousands of years from now.  No.  More and more, I believe the unbelievable.  The more they lie and cover up, the less I believe them.  It is more than obvious that there were sophisticated technologies used to build the megalithic sites around the world and there is more than enough evidence that giants existed.  Genesis 6, in the bible, talks about the fallen angels that lusted after woman and came down and copulated with them.  The offspring were the Nephilim, who were giants.  The Book of Enoch, found with the Dead Sea Scrolls, goes even further with this tale and is a must read.  It was left out of the bible, but gives us much insight into things that happened then.  Other ancient texts fill in the blanks with this story.  The Annunaki were not unlike us in that they had disputes among themselves, even among their family.  Enlil and Enki, who were brothers,  had a falling out, which led to a war.  It was because of homo sapien sapiens, you and I.  We were given knowledge and power that was not meant for us.  The Igigi were a race of beings that worked for the Annunaki.  They complained about not having women and asked to come down to earth and take wives and were denied.  They did it any ways.  This caused a war.  The Veda texts in India describe this war in great detail.  The offspring of the Annunaki-human union became demi-gods.  The offspring of the Igigi-human unions became giants, deformed and monstrous.  They ate humans and had six fingers on each hand and six toes on each foot  Dozens of ancient cultures talk about these giants, including the bible.  David killed Goliath, who had six fingers on each hand.  His father did too.  The giants that were finally killed off by Indians in America, had red hair, six fingers and toes and ate humans.   See Lovelock Cave and the Se-ti-ca.  Giant skeletons have been found all over the world.  Articles can be found in papers from the early 1900's explaining the discoveries.  All the skeletons were taken by the Smithsonian, never to be seen again.  Other countries have also confiscated the skeletons, such as in Malta.  Why?  I'm going to go with the fact that the ancient texts are true.  Our own origins are at risk with that belief, but so be it.  

Gilgamesh really lived.  The book written was a true account.  His tomb was discovered and his body was taken by the US military.  DNA analysis confirmed his origin.  The amazing truths of our ancient past are falling into place.  The picture is clearer and clearer.  What the recent scans of the Giza Plateau discovered are just another piece of the puzzle.  The machines of suppression are hard at work, but the momentum is on our side.  Getting verifiable proof will always be difficult because they hold the evidence and control access to the sights, but in just the past five years the amount of discoveries and questions being asked have increased dramatically.  The more the academics push back, the more you know you are on to the truth.  The old narratives are crumbling.  Disclosure is coming.

I'll leave you with an article from GrahamHancock.com  https://grahamhancock.com/longkf1/

Writer Dr Kelvin F. Long, asks some of the same questions I'm asking about Gilgamesh and has found something that I have not seen anywhere else.  In my picture above, which is actually his picture, he found a geoglyph in Uruk.  You can go on Google Earth and see it for yourself.  He searched many year back and the geoglyph was always there.  It does resemble the ancient sculpture of Gilgamesh, with a lion in one hand and a snake in the other.  Was this an ancient symbol to those in the heavens, who are the only ones who could see it, that this is where Gilgamesh lays?