I've been wondering where the environmentalists are lately? With a true environmental disaster happening in East Palestine, Ohio due to a massive chemical spill from faulty train tracks and maintenance, you'd think the environmentalists would be protesting the evil capitalist railroads, but no. They are nowhere to be found. It's also interesting that they haven't shown up at each and every dead whale found on New Jersey beaches, killed by off-shore windmills. They are not protesting the auto industry either. I mean, with the environmental and human disasters created by mining for lithium, cadmium and other rare earth minerals needed for electric cars, you'd think they would be protesting the poisoning of the water table and the deplorable conditions which poor Africans are subjected to. Nope. They never raised an eyebrow when it was revealed that when the blades of wind turbines reach their life expectancy that they are created with materials that can't be recycled, can't be used for anything else and are being buried in the landfills by the tens of thousands.
Unfortunately, there are hundreds more examples of this hypocrisy, but to spare you the long list, let's cut to the chase. The reason they aren't protesting is because they don't care. The entire green movement is all about money. Well, money and control. It's never been about the environment. While they shame you and I for doing anything that creates carbon emissions, they shout it from their mansions and private jets. If they can get you to do exactly as they say, buy what they want you to buy, eat what they want you to eat and drive what they want you to drive, then they have the control and the money. If they really cared about the environment, we wouldn't have such a push for renewable sources of energy that are so inefficient and detrimental to the environment, our standard of living or our national security. We'd actually be pursuing things like hydrogen cars, nuclear energy and stop attacking gas stoves and flatuant cows. By the way, did you notice what Biden said on his photo-op stop in Ukraine, that the US was going to help Poland build nuclear power plants, yet is absolutely against building them in our country? Isn't that amazing? Where is the outrage? There will never be any.
People like Al Gore and the throng of climate cultists like him are profiting off of the green movement and those that push it that aren't profiting are using it for control, like the Biden Administration and every other Democrat, et al. Gore, is a big talker who has been wrong on every one of his alarmist predictions for the planet. Not only that, a recent study of his hedge fund, Generation Investment Management, found that the companies it invests in had increased their carbon footprint more than any of the other dozen funds they studied. https://nypost.com/2023/02/20/al-gores-eco-friendly-investment-firm-owns-shares-in-polluting-companies-report/ His fund is a fairytale fund that is supposed to be a beacon for those that want to invest in sustainable things, yet Gore can't help himself in the pursuit of capitalism as he pursues socialism for you. He's amassed a fortune worth more than $350 million since leaving office. A fortune born of fear, shame and lies. I don't know how you can say anything else other than that about it. Not one thing he's claimed has come true, his predictions were dire, he said the planet had a fever and then cashed in like no one else had ever done. It is now estimated that globally we spend more than $500 billion on global warming and the cultists have said if we can get to $5 trillion, we might make a difference. Hmmm. There are now thousands and thousands of climate scientists, being funneled billions and billions of dollars. They are getting incredibly wealthy and with that money will buy all the power they could ever need. The richer they become, the less free you are and that is the point of it all. One thing is for certain, all that money in the climate change game has utterly corrupted it. You can't get a grant worth millions if you don't fall in line with the narrative. All you have to do is build a faulty climate model or make some outlandish claim about impending environmental disaster and ta da, here's your millions. Go against it, even if the data doesn't support the narrative and you may never work again. Do you really think that if you worked at a university and needed grant money to just have a job, that you would turn around and disprove climate change if that is where the money was coming from? Hell, no. True scientists might be appalled by my broad brush assumption that all of them are so easily corrupted by money and for sure many are not, but we've caught hundreds in the act of deception and it makes it hard to believe any of them, especially when they say the science is settled. Most of my argument isn't even with scientists, it's with politicians and advocates that push policy off of fear-mongering, but anyone who tries to convince me that people, even scientists, aren't corrupted by money is a liar. Remember when it was called global warming? It's been changed to climate change, just like rebranding a product. It's marketing for the weak minded. Climate change can now encompass every possible thing, where global warming was too specific. I'm sure it was poll tested.
Ponder this, the United States spent somewhere around $200 billion to leave the surly bonds of earth in the biggest challenge put forth in history. To land on the moon. We've spent three times that amount and still can't prove, without question, that the temperature of the earth rises due to man-made activities. There are several periods of time on this earth that just don't jive with that narrative. Times when there were no people and the global temperatures were much higher and much lower. These stubborn facts are incredibly irritating to the cultists. They try to ignore them, but their recent trick is to go back and adjust the temperatures with no scientific explanation as to why. NOAA and NASA did this and got caught. Funny thing is, all the temps prior to 2000 were adjusted to be cooler so it would show a warming trend after 2000. Just plain fraudulent. There is nothing more infuriating than being lied to in this manner. It is also why I think the Paris Climate Accords is among the top five worst things ever put on paper. America is punished severely under this stupid, asinine agreement, while China and our enemies laugh at us. Trump was right to pull out and we will rue the day if this assault on our country is ever ratified. For now, we have to suffer the likes of John Kerry and a bunch of multi-millionaires in Davos trying to set policy to run our lives.
The best way to bludgeon the climate cultists is to quote them directly when they let the cat out of the bag accidentally. Occasionally, you get the truth out of them and the next two quotes are some of the most damning I have read. It literally confirms everything I've been saying about it not being about the environment and an orgy of socialism. The best part is, the quotes are not from some insignificant players and I do give credit to Investors Business Daily for finding these quotes. Here is Ottmar Edenhofer, a former United Nations climate official who co-chaired the UN's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change,
Edenhofer: "One has to free oneself from the illusion that international climate policy is environmental policy. This has almost nothing to do with the environmental policy anymore, with problems such as deforestation or the ozone hole,"
Reporter: So what is the goal of environmental policy?
Edenhofer: "We redistribute de facto the world's wealth by climate policy."
Some apologists will say he didn't really mean that, so please explain this comment he made ten years earlier; "the next world climate summit in Cancun is actually an economy summit during which the distribution of the world's resources will be negotiated."
Next is Christiana Figueres, executive secretary of U.N.'s Framework Convention on Climate Change,
"This is the first time in the history of mankind that we are setting ourselves the task of intentionally, within a defined period of time, to change the economic development model that has been reigning for at least 150 years, since the Industrial Revolution,"
"This is probably the most difficult task we have ever given ourselves, which is to intentionally transform the economic development model for the first time in human history."
These are the cultists that we all need to fear and stop. They concocted the biggest lie of all time masqueraded as a cry for environmentalism and introduced it into our schools, our churches, our government and now our consciousness with the express purpose of destroying the economic development model and essentially guilting American and western populations to lower their standard of living to save a planet that isn't in peril. As they are doing this, they are investing heavily in the future energy sources and granting their friends money to research and write papers on the lie, all to enrich themselves as everyone else gets poorer. Redistribution is a tool of socialists and communists. It doesn't work in its original purpose of raising everyone up, but it does work when it is used to create an elite class and impoverish the rest of society. The question that keeps coming to mind after reading those quotes is, who the f*ck do these people think they are? Are your family's best interests in mind when they decided to redistribute your wealth? Your liberties and everything you thought America stood for is being stripped away by some bureaucrats that think you have it too good. The only way they get around being called thieves is, you have to vote for them in order for them to steal your money, so defacto giving them consent. They can be stopped, however.
Please take your time and look into how this push for green has worked out so far. Look at Sri Lanka, who forced their farmers to stop using traditional fertilizers, which subsequently destroyed their food output, causing starvation, mass inflation and then a populace that stormed the vestiges of power and overthrew their government, who fled for their lives. People died, people lost everything and their economy collapsed all because they were persuaded by the West to be green and sustainable. Look at Germany, who shut down their nuclear and coal power plants and went green, relying on solar and wind. Their cost of energy skyrocketed by 300%, and they would've suffered many freezing deaths this winter if the population had not cut down their forests to burn wood to survive. It was estimated last fall that the average German would spend 1/3 of their income on energy. They are now going back to coal. Hopefully, they learned their lesson, but I doubt it. Look at what the Dutch are doing to their farmers and look at what the results could be. A disaster, not just for the Dutch, but for all of Europe, as they create nearly as much food as we do. These are real world examples of going green and then dying, chaos, societal upheaval, lowering of the standards of living all because the promises of the green movement are lies. They don't work in real life. Take the simple example of "organic" food. Why does organic anything cost more? Why does any product that uses sustainable farming for its ingredients, cost more? It isn't better for you, though they will claim it is. It doesn't save the planet, yet they claim it does. Suckers like you pay more for it than the exact same products produced by tried and true, old-fashioned ways. It costs more because it literally cost more to produce. Yields are lower, it takes more time and energy, through more inefficient means, to make the products and in order to stay in business, you must pay more. The costs will never go down and half the products on the market that claim they are organic, aren't.
Did you know that in northern climates, solar panels produce energy only 18% of the time? When it snows, they don't even bother to clean them off because it costs more to do that than the energy it would create is worth. Wind is even more inefficient. By the end of last year, it cost more to run an electric car than to operate a gas powered one because the cost of electricity had blown up. Why? Because energy companies are relying on renewables, and it costs a lot more and produces a lot less. Look these things up, they're true, yet you will never hear them because the truth destroys the narrative. So, your kids are fed a non-stop lie about the climate in school at every level, you're fed it during the news on a nightly basis, it's pouring out of the mouths of half the politicians, even the businesses you work for are thinking about sustainability or buying electric vehicles. It's everywhere. They now claim, with not a scintilla of evidence, that the science is settled, call people who disagree, deniers, and it's fear and loathing over and over. Yet, the real evidence doesn't support any of it. Polar bears are dying. Lie. Sea levels are rising. Lie. Hurricanes are more frequent and more powerful. Lie. The hot weather is due to global warming, but wait, so is the cold weather. The climate is now so ubiquitous of an excuse that it has lost its meaning. There is only one side in this argument who has been caught lying over and over. Just one side. That would be the climate cultists. They fake data, or place sensors near heat sources or just exaggerate everything. There has not been a single study that hasn't been completely debunked, yet most people think it's a forgone conclusion that carbon emissions are causing global climate change. Why? The simplest answer to that is if you were to create a rigged game where no matter the outcome that you won, like throwing loaded dice, that might answer the question. If it's too hot, it's carbon's fault. If it's too cold, well that's global warming. If the warming slows or stops, it's because our push for green energy is working we have to keep going. If temps rise, we are destroying our planet. There is no scenario that temps just go up and down on their own. No scenario where we can't blame carbon emissions for. Totally rigged. To date, not one dire claim on the environment has come true and the reason the other side doesn't have to lie is they just report the data, which always seems to refute the cultists. So, proving climate change is caused by carbon emissions has become impossible. They've been at it for 30 years with no definitive proof. Hundreds of billions have been spent with no results, so since this means a loss of power, a loss of funding, a loss of credibility, they can't stop. What do they do? They simply say the science is settled, have the media and politicians repeat it and now it becomes the truth. Except, when you dig for it, you'll find it's a lie. The truth is out there. In true science, there are no disputes. If anyone can do the same study and get the same results 100% of the time, then that is called science. We have the Scientific Method for this. However, introduce billions of dollars of incentives to fund one monolithic viewpoint and now you won't get true science anymore. You have what we call corruption.
fraud noun
1. Deceit, trickery: specifically: intentional perversion of truth in order to induce another to part with something of value or surrender a legal right.
I recently read a study that claimed that climate scientists have now completed a 67 million year time-line of our planet's climate and they determined that green house gas emissions are pushing us towards global temps not seen in 50 million years. Of course, 50 million years ago green house gases were much higher with no people around and they offered no other evidence to support their conclusions than we said so. The conclusion was written before the science ever took over. It was a predetermined outcome. They even took the time to calculate the earth's proximity to the sun to aid their conclusions that when we are closer to the sun that temps were higher, but never bothered to tell us how the sun's radiation varied throughout the 67 million years. Currently, the sun ended cycle 24 and began cycle 25 in 2019. It will reach the peak of its new cycle in 2025, we think, because the sun's cycles roughly follow 11-year patterns. True scientists actually believe the sun's cycles of irradiance has caused the warming we saw from 2000 to 2016. The earth has been cooling since 2016, in case you weren't told that by a climate cultist. Of course you weren't because no main stream media outlet covered one second of it, yet it was the largest two-year drop in temps in over 50 years(2016-2018) and it hasn't stopped. In past cycles of quiet irradiance from the sun, global temps sank by almost 3%. Look it up, it was called the Maunder Minimum. A 70-year period where there were only 50 sun-spots, when there are normally 40 to 50 thousand. It happened to coincide with the Little Ice Age, 1645 to 1715. Hmmm, here's a truth that is irrefutable, yet, ignored by the cultists. The oceans have as much to do with climate as the sun, perhaps more. No mention of the oceans, other than to say the temperature has risen,
The real problem is that enough well-meaning people have been co-opted and believe that the climate has changed and that our planet is in peril and you must do your part. People don't want to be canceled or shunned or ridiculed for their beliefs, so they go along. That timidity has led to light bulbs being banned and replaced by ones that are 100 times more harmful to the environment than the ones they replaced. The mega-idiots in California are banning gas powered lawn mowers and leaf blowers and soon gas powered cars. It doesn't matter that the vast numbers of citizens can't afford electric, they are being forced to go along. Yet, of anywhere in the country, California has the worst power grid there is, with constant black and brown outs. They already can't supply the power necessary, but now are forcing people to go electric. It's a disaster in the making, but they are plowing ahead with it. How the hell do these people get elected? The cost of electricity in California has risen five times faster than anywhere else in the country. The state budget deficit was just released and it is $7 billion worse than predicted. A $29.5 billion deficit in a state already riddled with homelessness, feces infested streets, a crime problem that is out of control, a water problem, a power problem all of their own making. This is what the rest of us have to look forward to with a push for green energy. Electricity rates in the US continue to increase dramatically in the last 10 years with a 4.3% increase in 2021 and a 6.1% increase over that in 2022. The increases are five times as much in states that are pursuing carbon free or neutral alternatives for power. The two countries with the highest rates, Germany and Denmark, are the two countries that nearly abandoned coal and nuclear power before this disastrous winter. They both pay more than twice as much as we do. Green energy doesn't work, it's not efficient and its costs are born by those that can least afford it. Geez, by today's Democrat standards, that would be considered racist if it wasn't a liberal idea.
I must say this because if I don't, I'll be labeled a denier and other ists and isms. I keep up on this because I want to know the truth and we aren't getting it. People like me are not against the planet. In fact, since I'm not a scientist with no actual data of my own, I'm not trying to convince you of anything other than to be more skeptical. I am all for conservation. I believe you should do everything that you want to do when it comes to being green and conserving. I'm all for businesses doing the same and I want the government to test for clean air and water and punish the polluters. I do not want to be told I have to do anything. Government mandating anything is an infringement on my rights as an American. If a product, like solar panels or wind mills cannot survive in the market on its own, it should die the death that millions of other products have done. If it's going to cost trillions and trillions to upgrade our power grid, and trillions more to build the infrastructure and trillions more to mine and build batteries, all the while, destroying the planet in the process for a product that doesn't work in the cold and is actually going to create a huge disposal problem later, why would we ever embark on such a journey? Of course, the apologists say that we subsidized oil and the roads and pipelines, so we just have to subsidize electric power. What a terrible excuse. It's simple. You do as you want and I do as I want. If you want to pay more for everything because it makes you feel better, go ahead. I will always take the rational and practical approach and pay less for products that work and are efficient. If something makes sense, I'll pay more, but only if I want to. I also agree that we do need another source of energy. Oil is a limited resource and one day it will be scarce enough to not be economical any longer. I do support research and believe that if we created another space race for energy, we'd find it. It may have already been found. I'm huge on hydrogen. Clean and abundant, easy to produce, it has only yet to be harnessed to its potential. The world is being manipulated by the biggest hoax in history through authoritarian means and government over-reach on the one hand and the largest money grab on the other. When the powerful and the extremely wealthy join hands in screwing the rest of us, nothing good can come from it. Green has failed everywhere it has been tried to catastrophic ends and it threatens our security and your way of life. If it really was a good way to go, you wouldn't have to force people into it. To answer my main question from the beginning, where are the environmentalists? It turns out people like me are the true environmentalists. We see the bullshit of the movement and call it out for what it is, all the while pursuing the real earth-friendly alternatives when they make economic and strategic sense for all of us, not just those profiting off of it.
Add comment
Comments